Unsatisfactory outcomes following male breast reduction surgery can manifest in various ways, including contour irregularities (such as dents, divots, or excessive tissue removal), asymmetry, visible scarring, nipple malposition, and sensory changes. These complications can stem from factors such as surgical technique, patient anatomy, and the healing process itself. For example, overly aggressive liposuction can lead to contour deformities, while inadequate glandular excision may result in persistent breast tissue.
Understanding the potential for suboptimal aesthetic or functional outcomes is crucial for patients considering this procedure. Thorough pre-operative consultations, realistic expectations, and surgeon selection based on experience and expertise are essential for minimizing risks. Historically, techniques for addressing gynecomastia have evolved significantly, leading to improved outcomes and fewer complications. Examining the potential pitfalls allows patients to engage in informed decision-making and fosters open communication with surgeons.
